TRANSIT NEW ZEALAND
PERFORMANCE SPECIFIED MAINTENANCE
CONTRACT PSMC 001
TNZ CONTRACT NO. 2/98-025/601
Request for Tender
Note: The
following document represents part of the tender document only. For further
information, please contact Transit New Zealand directly.
PART 2: GENERAL DESCRIPTION OF CONTRACT
2.1
INTRODUCCION
The fundamental principle pertaining to this
Contract, is the provision by the Contractor of all services and physical works
for the maintenance of state highway Assets, for a period of 10 years, to
prescribed Performance Measures for a lump sum price, with the Contractor
carrying all risks except those specifically excluded. This clause presents a
general overview of the philosophy of the Contract.
The Contractor will aim to maximise the reliability,
safety and availability of the network to road users. The Contractor will also
aim to operate the network to the satisfaction of road users, adjacent
landowners and members of the public.
Assets:
The Assets to be maintained include everything
within the state highway corridor.
Information pertaining to the Assets has been
provided to all Invited Tenderers in good faith. Appendices L and M list all of
the information provided. Invited Tenderers must verify for themselves the
adequacy and accuracy of the information provided before lodging their Tender.
Performance
Measures:
The Performance Measures and Method of
Calculation are set out in Appendix G and represent the minimum acceptable
levels the Contractor must achieve. The Contractor is required to implement a
complete Quality System which includes monitoring of its own performance and
the demonstration of compliance with the Performance Measures throughout, and
at the end of, the contract period.
The Contract provides for formal annual audits
of the Contractor's performance by an independent party. The Superintendent
will also monitor the Contractor's performance at regular and random intervals,
and assets the performance of the Contractor accordingly.
Lump Sum Price:
The tendered lump sum price will include all
costs to bring the Assets up to the Base Condition Standard, together with the
cost to provide all the required services to meet the Performance Measures.
Innovation is strongly encourages under the PSMC. The Contractor is expected to
develop innovative ways of providing the Services and achieving the specified
Performance Measures. There will be no extra payments for innovation
development costs and there will be no reduction in payment to the Contract, in
the event that innovation reduces the Contractor's cost provide the contract
conditions are met. Refer Clause 4.5.4.
The Contractor will be paid for the Services
monthly throughout the Contract period, regardless of the quantum of the actual
works and services provided.
Risks:
A risk is defined as an uncertain event which
when it occurs, may have a material effect on the extent of the Services to be
performed by the Contractor or the cost to the Contractor of performing the
Services.
Except where explicitly stated to the contrary,
the Contractor bears all risks in the lump sum tendered price. The explicitly
stated risks accepted by the Principal are listed in Appendix H.
PSMC Trial:
This Contract is a trial of the Performance
Specified Maintenance Contract (PSMC) form of the contracting out maintenance
works and services. It is a new form of contract in New Zealand and has only
been utilised to a limited extent overseas.
The PSMC form of contract seeks to maximise the
skills, expertise, innovation and systems of the roading industry to provide
better outcomes, and thus better value for money.
The Contract is non-prescriptive, and it allows
the Contractor to elect how it meets the required outcomes.
The trial has the support of Transfund New
Zealand, subject to the following conditions:
1.
The
trial will proceed if it can be demonstrated that the cost to maintain the
Assets to a like standard by the existing methods and contracts is greater than
the cost of carrying out the maintenance under a PSMC.
The cost of maintenance utilising
the existing methods and contracts is the Award Hurdle. All Invited Tenderers
are required to demonstrate they can overcome the Award Hurdle before the Base
Tender and any Alternatives Offers are considered.
2.
Tenders
received be evaluated in accordance with an approved Competitive Pricing
Procedure. Transfund New Zealand has given approval to the procedure set out in
Appendix J.
Fundamental to the Contract is the need for a
co-operative approach by the contracting parties, and a willingness of the Contractor
to accept risk. The Contract does not provide for withholding payment as a
penalty for a non-performance of the Contractor except as expressly provide in
the general conditions. Instead it provides for termination of the Contract by
the Principal in the event that the Contractor fails to meet its obligations
under the Contract.
The proposed establishment of a Management
Board together with the framework of this document, are considered by the
Principal to promote the Contract objectives.
In awarding this Contract the Principal
expects:
·
To
engage a contractor who embraces the philosophy stated above
·
To
engage a contractor that will take every step to make this trial a success; and
·
All
parties to be successful.
2.2
SERVICES TO BE PROVIDE
The Services under the Contract shall include:
·
management
of the Assets for a period of 10 years, to meet the Performance Measures
·
routine,
periodic maintenance and rehabilitation of the Assets, including pavements,
surfaces, drainage, traffic safety signs and equipment, highway lighting
currently the responsibility of the Principal, and railway level crossing,
vegetation control, etc.
·
collection
and management of asset inventory data, including RAMM database data
·
routine
and periodic (non-structural) maintenance and rehabilitation of bridges and
other structures within, over or under the networks
·
call-out
and attendance to emergencies
·
response
to public requests, complaints and feedback
·
other
services such as Land Entry, Access Control and Overweight Permit Supervision.
The services include receipt of the Assets and
records from the existing service suppliers and, at the completion of the
Contract, handover of the Assets and records to the incoming contractor/s.
The Contractor will be responsible for arranging
all resources and skills necessary to undertake the Services including
establishment of depots, and provision of labour, plant and materials.
The Services to be Provided shall not include:
·
installation
and maintenance of speed camera detectors, traffic counting station detectors
and recorders, barrier arms and associated signals, variable message signs,
emergency telephones and closed-circuit televisions
·
structural
repair and structural maintenance of bridges
·
maintenance
of projects, whilst they are in a defects liability period and the subject of
other separate and discrete contracts.
The Services to be Provided are more fully
described in Appendix F.
2.3
VARIATIONS TO SCOPE AND TIMING OF
SERVICES
The Contractor is required to accept variations
to the Services to be Provide throughout the term of the Contract, as advised
by the Superintendent and in accordance with Clause 4.7. Variations may result
from, but not limited to, the following:
·
changes
to the Contractor's maintenance programme suggested or required by the
Principal
·
variations
to the Performance Measures which are defined in Appendix G
2.4
LIMIT OF WORKS
The lateral Limit of Works is the road reserve
boundaries for the Assets except as noted bellow. Where an existing fence line
lies within the road reserve boundary, the Limit of Works shall be defined by
the fence line.
The legal road reserve boundaries are
illustrated on "Terra View" 4.0 GIS Data View and Local Land
Information. A copy of this information is available for viewing by all Invited
Tenderers during the tender period.
The Contractor is required to have some means
of establishing where the legal road reserve boundaries are, and land
ownership, throughout the duration of the Contract.
In addition, there exists in specific areas,
agreements of one sort or another with adjoining landowners relating to a
variety of matters which are directly or indirectly relevant to the maintenance
of the Assets. The Contractor is responsible for the Principal's obligation in
respect of these agreements. The agreements are indexed in Appendix L.
In a number of locations, the state highway is
known to be located only partly within the legal road reserve. Under such
circumstances the Limit of Works is to be taken as the existing fence line, or
the top of a cut batter, or toe of a fill batter, which ever is of greater
offset from the road centreline but extending to the inlet and outlet
structures of any culverts under the road.
In urban areas the Principal has a Memorandum
of understanding with each territorial authority defining limits of
responsibility. These are included in Appendix E.
The detailed definition of the Limit of Works,
including the extent of the networks and relevant local agreements is included
as Appendix E.
Ownership of the Assets within the Limit of
Works remains with the Principal.
2.5
VARIATIONS TO LIMIT OF WORKS
The Contractor is required to accept variations
to the Limit of Works throughout the term of the Contract, as advised by the
Superintendent and in accordance with Clause 4.7. Variations may result from,
but are not limited to, the following:
·
Handover
of additional section/s of highway or completed construction projects to the
Contractor
·
Handover
of sections of the Assets to other authorities (e.g. Councils)
·
Removal
of a section of the Assets
·
Temporary
removal of a section of the Assets to facilitate capital and other works
projects by another party.
2.11
MAINTENANCE RESPONSIBILITY
The Contractor will not be responsible for
maintenance to any assets that lie within the limit of works of current
contracts between the date of possession of site and the end of the maintenance
period of those separate contracts. All maintenance and defects are the
responsibility of other contractor/s until the end of a defects liability
period at which time the assets will be handed over to the Contractor.
The Contractor will not be responsible for
maintenance to any part of the network which has been upgraded as a capital
work by another party, while the length of highway is the subject of a defects
liability period.
The Contractor will not be responsible for the
maintenance of that section of the highway included within the limits of a
capital works contract being undertaken within the Limit of Works by another
party for the duration of that other contract. The Contractor's responsibility
under such circumstances ends on the date of handover of possession of site to
the capital works contractor and begins again when the satisfactorily completed
work is handed back to the Principal and the Contractor for ongoing
maintenance.
A join inspection by all parties on completion
of other contracts will identify any particular maintenance or omission
responsibilities of the other contractor that may exist at the end of their
contract maintenance period, and the Contractor will not resume responsibility
for ongoing day to day and periodic maintenance of part of the Assets in
question until the identified reasonable responsibilities of the other
contractor are discharged, but only to the extend that such responsibilities
have not been discharged.
2.12
QUALITY REQUIREMENTS
The Contractor will be required to develop and
implement an auditable Quality System for all Services provided.
It will be the Contractor's responsibility to
ensure all subcontractors and subconsultants comply will the requirements of
the Quality System.
2.13
SAFETY REQUIREMENTS
The Contractor shall develop and implement an
aggressive Safety Management and Intervention Plan. This Plan shall provide, at
a minimum:
·
Identification
and prevention of safety problems
·
Detailed
procedures such as traffic management and emergency response
·
Information
management
·
Safety
monitoring
A more detailed description of the requirements
is in Appendix F Clause F14.
2.14
ENVIRONMENTAL REQUIREMENTS
The Contractor shall act in an environmentally
sensitive manner at all times.
The Contractor will comply with all
requirements of all resource consents for the Services under the Contract,
including any reporting requirements.
Documents relating to current and pending resource
consents issued under the Resource Management Act 1991 have been provided to
all Invited Tenderers. These documents are listed in Appendix L.
The Contractor will be responsible for the
annual charges, and all other costs associated with those resource consents
that are not related to capital works projects, together with responsibility
for renewal of the resource consents, and procurement of any further resource
consents, as may be necessary for continued execution of the Services under the
Contract. The condition of any such resource consents must be met.
The Contractor's attention is drawn to:
·
The
existence of scenic and similar reserve land adjacent to the Limit of Works
·
Geological
and geomorphic features within and adjoining the Limits of Work of cultural,
environmental or scenic significance.
·
The
existence and limitations of Regional Council general authorisations, and
guidelines
The Contractor is required to identify all
locations of environmental, cultural, and scenic value, and put in place
procedures and practices that satisfy the conditions of all consents,
compliance notices, and guidelines, including those related to emergencies.
4.5
CONTRACTOR'S OPERATIONAL OBLIGATIONS
4.5.1 Quality Plan
(a)
The
Contractor must develop, maintain and follow a Quality System and Quality Plan.
(b)
The
Quality System shall be effective upon Commencement of the Contract and shall
be independently certified to ISO 9002 standard within a period specified by
the Contractor. Refer to Clause 1.4.2.6.
4.5.4
Innovation Requirements
(a)
Throughout
the term of the Contract, the Contractor must explore, develop and present to
the Management Board potential Improvement Initiatives.
(b)
The
Contractor must, in a similar manner, pursue potential Improvement Initiatives
suggested to it by notice from the Principal or the Superintendent.
4.5.4.1 Relevant Initiatives
Examples of potential Improvement Initiatives
are:
·
Reduced
maintenance cost and resulting payment (e.g. maintenance effort, longer life
treatments);
·
Reduced
running costs;
·
Improved
levels of Service;
·
Improved
road safety performance;
·
Added
functionality (e.g. more features to meet road user needs);
·
Reduced
capital cost; and
·
Increased
service life of the Assets.
4.5.4.2 Approval of improvement Initiatives
(a)
The
Contractor may carry out Improvement Initiatives as of right that do not
require any additional payment or any reduction in the level of Service,
Performance Measures or the Contractor's Obligations otherwise Improvement
Initiatives will only be implemented if approved by the Management Board. The
Contractor, in seeking approval to implement a new Initiative, must present to
the Management Board for its consideration a brief report including:
·
Description
of the nature of the Initiative;
·
Previous
implementations;
·
Risk
involved and methods for mitigation;
·
Time
proposed to implement;
·
Additional
or reduced payment for the Initiative;
·
Benefits
quantified and qualified including any safety related benefits;
·
Special
conditions;
·
Proposed
sharing of benefits between Principal and Contractor; and
·
Consistency
with the TNZ national state highway management
(b)
The
Management Board must assess the proposed Initiative and, if appropriate, make
a recommendation to the Principal for its Approval, including in respect of any
proposed alterations to payments under the Contract as provided for in Clause
4.6.12.
In making its recommendation in
respect of alteration to payment the Management Board shall be guided by the
principle that if any cost saving results from an Approved Improvement Initiative
which does not relax any requirements of the Contract then there shall be no
reduction in payments.
4.5.4.3 Implementation of initiatives
If implementation of an Approved Initiative
results in an effect on payment, a variation will be issued for its adoption.
4.5.4.4 Consideration by Management Board
(a)
It is
intended that the Management Board will reach a solution and make a
recommendation to the Principal which will be beneficial and agreeable to both
the Principal and the Contractor.
(b)
The
actual process implemented will vary depending on a number of factors,
including but not limited to the type of Initiative and its cost benefit,
technical issues, funding levels and corporate and Government policies.
Some possible examples of outcomes
of discussion within the Management Board are listed below.
·
The
Principal funds the Initiative to gain benefits from improved service levels
with nil reduction in maintenance volume of work and associated payments.
·
The
Principal provides 100% of funding for the Initiative, the Contractor's volume
of work varies and Contract payment to the Contractor is varied accordingly.
·
The
Principal and the Contractor jointly fund the Initiative and both parties share
the benefits from implementing the Initiative. The benefits may be cost
benefits, payment benefits or service benefits.
·
The
Contractor funds the Initiative with no change to the Lump Sum Payment as the
Initiative reduces the overall costs of the project to the Contractor and does
not require any lowering of the Performance Measures.
·
The
Contractor funds the Initiative and reduces its required maintenance costs and
shares the benefit with the Principal by a reduction to payments from the
Principal.
4.6.9
Adjustment for Rise and Fall in
Costs
(a)
All
prices, but not percentages, in the Price Schedules and the Lump Sum Payment
are subject to adjustment for rise and fall in costs.
(b)
The
Adjustment will be made once only in each calendar year.
(c)
The
adjustment will be determined by the method described in Appendix D.
Calculation of Cost Fluctuation
Adjustment
The amounts payable by the Principal to the
Contractor, under the terms of the Contract shall be adjusted up or down by
amounts calculated in accordance with the following formula:
C = VxF
Where:
F = [ 
]
Where:
The value of F shall be rounded to four decimal
places before final multiplication with valuation of work, V.
F= Cost Fluctuation adjustment factor
C= Cost fluctuation adjusted payment
due to the Contractor for the month under consideration.
V= Payment due to the Contractor for
the month under consideration based on the lump sum and any Additional Works,
priced using the rates agreed as the basis of the Contract, and excluding the
cost fluctuation adjustment.
W= Labour
Cost Index - All Salary and Wage Rates; All Sections Combined, All Industries
Combined, published by Statistics New Zealand for the quarter within which
August falls for the year under consideration.
G= Producers
Price Index Inputs- Industry Group 10
Non-Metallic Mineral Products, published by Statistics New Zealand for the
quarter within which August falls for the year under consideration.
B= Producers
Price Index Inputs- Industry Group 15 Construction, published by Statistics
New Zealand for the quarter within which August falls for the year under
consideration.
T= Producers
Price Index Inputs- Industry Group 17 Part 1 Transport and Storage.
R= Producers
Price Index Inputs- Industry Group 17 Part 2 Road Transport, published by
Statistics New Zealand for the quarter within which August falls for the year
under consideration.
P= Farm
Expenses Price Index- All Farms - Fuel, published by Statistics New Zealand
for the quarter within which August falls for the year under consideration.
W', G', B', T', R', P'= As defined for W, G,
B, T, R and P respectively but applying for the quarter during which August
1998 fell.
For the period ending 30th June
1999, no cost fluctuation shall be paid. i.e. F=1 and C=V
For subsequent years the cost fluctuation
factor, F, shall be calculated once only using the indices for the quarter
containing the month of August. As an example, the value of F to apply for
payments in the months of 1st July 1999 to 30 June 2000 shall be
established using the indices for the quarter containing the month of August 1999.
For the purpose of calculating the cost
fluctuation adjustment, any payment items which are based on actual cost or
current prices and any advances shall be excluded from the calculation.
No other cost fluctuation adjustment will be
made by reason of any inaccuracy in the proportion of inputs specified.
The indices to be used in the calculation of
fluctuation shall be those first published by Statistics New Zealand for the
first quarter.
If at any time any of the indices referred to
are no longer published by Statistics New Zealand, or if the basis of any index
is materially changed, the adjustment shall thereafter be calculated by using
such other index or in such other manner, as will fairly reflect the changes as
previously measured by that index.
Extent and Limit of
Works
The Limit of Works is as follows:
|
State Highway |
Start RP |
Finish RP |
Approximate Length
(km) |
Comments |
|
3 |
RP
5/4.40 |
RP
218/9.55 |
215.0 |
From
just north of Airport Road intersection (SH21) south of Hamilton City, to
just west of Mahoetahi Rd near SH 3A intersection, New Plymouth |
|
31 |
RP
0/0.00 |
RP
47/9.20 |
56.3 |
Otorohanga
to Kawhia |
|
37 |
RP
0/0.00 |
RP 0/7.43 |
7.3 |
Hangatiki
to Waitomo Caves |
|
4 |
RP
0/0.00 |
RP
61/8.80 |
69.7 |
Eight
Mile Junction to Kururau Road, Taumarunui |
|
30 |
RP0/0.00 |
RP
47/14.14 |
60.6 |
Te
Kuiti to Taupo District Boundary |
|
Total |
|
|
408.9 |
|
For Contract administration and defining the
scope and standard of service required, the Limit of Works consists of three networks.
They are:
North Network - SH3
from RP 5/4.40 to RP 76/2.0 i.e. from the start through to just south of Te
Kuiti Borough plus all of SH37.
South Network - SH3
from RP 76/2.0 to RP 218/9.55 plus SH4 from RP 0/0.00 to RP 61/8.80
East West Network- al
of SH31 and SH30 between RP0/0.00 and RP 47/14.14
The map at the end of
this Appendix relates.
Al state highways through urban areas are
included in the network which passes through the area of urban development, and
the state highways in such urban areas are to be maintained to the standards
set down for the respective adjoining network.
Te Kuiti and Otorohanga Urban areas shall be
part of the North Network.
The Principal has a memorandum of understanding
with each of the territorial authorities prescribing limits of responsibility
where the state highway passes through urban areas.
F 12 SERVICES SYSTEMS
The Contractor will take a systems approach to
delivery of all services. This system will be sufficiently documented to allow
the Principal to fulfil the audit role. Such a system will be partitioned into
functional areas and will include all process and procedures to ensure
compliance with the Contract requirements.
The following are examples of the services to
be provided by the Contractor:
a)
Annual Plan (Capital Works)
The Contractor will maintain a 10-year
forward capital works programme developed using the Project Evaluations Manual
and Programme and Funding Manual. Estimates will be prepared using the
Principal's rules on contingencies.
Each year, the year 2 projects will
form the basis of the Annual Plan deliverable in accordance with Section G4 of
Appendix G.
b)
Capital Works
The Contractor may be retained from
time to time to carry out capital works projects. The Performance Measures relating
to such works will be the subject of the project specific terms and conditions
and not those of the Contract.
c)
Environmental Compliance
In the performance of the Contract,
the Principal aims to foster an environmentally responsible attitude on the
part of the Contractor, its employees and subcontractors. Such compliance
includes complying with existing resource consents investigating and obtaining
all additional consents required under the Resource Management Act.
Environmental compliance relates to all inputs or actions taking place within
the Limit of Works.
The Principal engaged in a one off
costs share agreement with Environment Waikato during July 1997 for the
planting of trees to stabilise farmland below SH3, south of Mahoenui (from RP
103/14.6 to RP 103/14.7). The Principal has no further obligations regarding
this planting.
d)
Land Entry
All land entry consents required for
maintenance activities shall be arranged by the Contractor.
e)
Communication
·
The
Contractor shall prepare, for the approval of the Superintendent, then action
appropriate media releases as and when necessary.
·
The
Contractor shall establish a communication system which includes logging
complaints.
f)
Health and Safety
In the performance of the Contract the Principal aims to foster a
responsible attitude toward occupational health and safety on the part of the
Contractor, its employees and subcontractors.
g)
Emergency Procedures and Contingency
Plans
The Contractor shall develop and
maintain up to date specific procedures for emergency events, together with
contingency plans associated with closure of the State Highway at any point.
The procedures shall include all
necessary detour plans, signage and communication requirements.
h)
General Management of Network
Control
The Contractor is responsible for
the day to day management of network control which includes, but is not limited
to such issues as:
·
obstructions
and partial closures
·
unauthorised
works
·
abandoned
vehicles
·
fences
and encroachments
·
damage
repair cost recovery
·
stock control
·
purchase,
control and disposal of the Principal's assets
·
closure
of State Highways
·
roadside
trading
·
unauthorised
signs
·
illegal
crossings and services
·
actions
potentially having significant adverse effects to the State Highway
environment.
G1 INTRODUCTION
This Contract is based on the concept of
passing total management and maintenance responsibility for the Assets, to the
Contractor, for 10 years. To support the Contract, a Performance Measure
framework has been developed. The objectives of the Performance Measures
framework are to:
·
Provide
a Contracted Condition Standard at the Commencement of Services. This
Contracted Conditions Standard will be compared to the condition of the Assets
at the completion of the Contract.
·
Provide
a means to monitor and assess the Contractor's performance during the Contract.
·
Provide
security to the Principal that the condition of the Assets, and the Services to
be Provided are being measured during the Contract.
G2 PERFORMANCE MEASURE FRAMEWORK
G2.1 Performance Measures
There are two categories of Performance
Measures, Physical Works Performance Measures and Service Performance Measures.
G2.1.1 Physical
Works Performance Measures
The Physical Works Performance Measures are
divided into two sub-categories being Network Condition Measures and Asset
Maintenance Standards as listed in Parts 1A and 1B respectively of Section G4
of this Appendix G.
G2.1.2 Service
Performance Measures
The Service Performance Measures relate to
professional and management services. Service Performance Measures relating to
Reporting are listed in Part 2 of Section G4 of this Appendix G. Other Service
Performance Measures are required to be identified and defined in Tenders in
accordance with Clause 1.4.2.7.
G2.2 Conditions Standards
There are three condition standards, Base
Condition Standard, Contracted Condition Standard and Final Condition Standard.
G2.2.1 Base
Condition Standard
The Base Condition Standard is the condition to
which the Assets must be maintained under the terms of the Base Tender. The
Base Condition Standard forms the basis of tendering and may become part of the
Contracted Condition Standard.
The Base Condition Standard for all Network
Condition Measures except Residual Life shall be the actual condition of the
Assets at Commencement of Services as measured and calculated by the Contractor
in accordance with Clause G3.3.
The Base Condition Standard for Residual Life
is that calculated by the Principal in accordance with Clause G3.1.
The Base Condition Standard for Asset
Maintenance Standards is specified in Part 1B of Section G$ of this Appendix G.
The Base Condition Standard for Reporting under
Service Performance Measures are those listed in Part 2 of Section G4 of this
Appendix G.
G2.2.2 Contracted
Condition Standard
The Contracted Condition Standard is the
contracted condition to which the Assets are to be maintained, as agreed
between the Principal and the Contractor. It consists of both the Physical
Works Performance Measures and Service Performance Measures including all those
nominated in the Preferred Tender and as negotiated between the Principal and
the Contractor in accordance with Clause G3.3.
G2.2.3 Final
Condition Standard
The Final Condition Standard is the condition
of the Assets upon completion of the Contract as measured by the Principal.
G2.3 Inspections and Reviews
G2.3.1 Network
Condition
Compliance with the Network Condition Measures
will be monitored by High Speed Data Collection (HSDC), Falling Weight
Deflectometer (FWD) and the related calculations.
The annual collection and the data recorded by
High Speed Data Collection Vehicle (HSDV) analysis and SCRIM is the
responsibility of the Contractor. Collection and validation of data is to be
performed in accordance with the relevant specifications in this Appendix G.
The collection of data recorded by Falling
Weight Deflectometer (FWD) is the responsibility of the Contractor. Collection
of data is to be performed in years 3,6,8 and 10 of the Contract in accordance
with Section G8 of this Appendix G.
Data collected by HSDC shall be maintained by
the Contractor and results provided to the Principal.
G2.3.2 Asset
Maintenance
Compliance with the Asset Maintenance Standards
will be monitored by a combination of data collection and visual inspections.
The Contractor will be responsible for collecting its own data for management
of the Contract and for provision of data collection such as is required to
demonstrate skid resistance and texture compliance. The Superintendent will
generally only collect data in the event of a failure in the Contractor's
non-compliance system being recorded in a random audit performed in accordance
with Clause G2.3.3. or upon receiving complaints from the public.
G2.3.3 Random Audits
Compliance with the Asset Maintenance Standards
and Services Performance Measures will be monitored by primarily by random
audits of the Contractor's non-compliance system. The Superintendent will perform random audits as he deems
necessary and may engage others to assist him in this task.
G2.3.4 Independent Reviews
The Principal will contract with an Independent
Auditor to perform an annual review of the Contractor's performance, in terms
of compliance with the Performance Measures.
The review will consist of a visual inspection,
as described in Clause G2.3.2, and a random audit, as described in Clause
G2.3.3.
The sample size for the visual inspection will
be 100% in the first and final years and as determined by the Superintendent at
the time of the review throughout the term of the Contract.
The draft Request for Tender document for
selection of an Independent Auditor is included in Appendix I.
G3 PROCESS
G3.1 Historic Data
The Principal has undertaken High Speed Data
Collection of State Highways for several years, measuring Roughness, Texture,
Rutting and Skid Resistance. The results of these surveys, as they pertain to
the Limit of Works, have been provided to Invited Tenderers, referenced in
Appendix L as Item 5, Revisions 1, 2 and 3.
The Principal has recently undertaken a FWD
survey of the Assets within the Limit of Works. The initial results of this
survey were provided to Invited Tenderers, referenced in Appendix L as Item 55,
Revision 1, Item 68, Revision 1 and Item 69, Revision 1 and later amended,
referenced in Appendix L as Item 151, Revision 1.
The Principal has undertaken a 20% sample
visual inspection of the Limit of Works to assist in setting the Base Condition
Standard of Asset Maintenance Standards. The results of this survey have been
provided to Invited Tenderers, referenced in Appendix L as Item 152 Revision 1.
With the exception of the results of the FWD
survey, which has been used to calculate the Residual Life Performance Measure,
the historic information on the condition of the Assets, as supplied by the
Principal, does not form part of the Contract.
G3.2 Tender and Tender Evaluation
Invited Tenderers shall propose in their Tender
Performance Measures for both Physical Works and Services in accordance with
Clause 1.4.2.7.
The Performance Measures and their framework
will be finalised as part of the negotiation between the Principal and the
Preferred Tenderer in accordance with Clause 1.5.7.
G3.3 Finalisation of Contracted Condition
Standard
Within 3 month of Commencement of Services, the
Contractor shall perform a HSDC survey in accordance with Clause G2.3.1 and
calculate the Base Condition Standard for all Network Condition Measures except
Residual Life.
The Base Condition Standard for all Network
Condition Measures except Residual Life, as measured and calculated by the
Contractor will be considered by the Management Board.
The Management Board shall satisfy itself as to
the accuracy and validity of the Contractors data and shall then set the
Contracted Condition Standard for all Network Condition Measures listed in Part
1A of Section G4 of this Appendix G, except Residual Life, which shall be the
Management Board's assessment of the actual condition of the Assets at handover
to the Contractor.
The Performance Measures agreed as the basis of
the Contract in accordance with Clause G3.2, as modified by the Management
Boards determination of the Contracted Condition Standard of all Network
Condition Measures, except Residual Life, will form the Contracted Condition
Standard.
G.3.4 Compliance Assessment
Compliance with the Performance Measures will
be monitored by the Contractor and the Superintendent throughout the term of
the Contract in accordance with Clauses G2.3.1, G2.3.2 and G2.3.3.
Compliance with the Performance Measures will
be reviewed by the Independent Auditor in accordance with Clause G2.3.4.
The first identification of a fault or defect
will not be recorded as a non-compliance if it can be demonstrated by the
Contractor's systems that the fault or defect is programmed for rectification
within the response time specified for that type of fault or defect. Failure to
rectify within the required response time and/or failure of the Contractor's
systems to demonstrate compliance and/or subsequent identification of the same
fault or defect will be assessed as described below.
Following the completion of any inspection or
review performed in accordance with Clause G2.3, the Contractor's performance
will be graded as: Satisfactory, Marginal, Unsatisfactory. The following
criteria shall apply.
Unsatisfactory
-
any
single instance of non-compliance with any Priority 1 Performance Measure
OR
-
non
compliance with an unacceptable number of Priority 2 Performance Measures or an
unacceptable number of instances of the same Priority 2 Performance Measure
OR
-
any
single instance of non-compliance with a Priority 2 Performance Measures
identified is a previous performance review and not rectified within the
response time
OR
-
non-compliance
with an unacceptable number of Priority 3 Performance Measures or an
unacceptable number of instances of the same Priority 3 Performance Measure,
identified in a previous performance review and not rectified within the
response time
OR
-
non
compliance with any single instance or a Priority 3 Performance Measure
identified in previous performance reviews and not rectified within twice the
response time.
Marginal
-
any
single instance of non-compliance with any Priority 2 Performance Measures
OR
-
non-compliance
with an unacceptable number or Priority 3 Performance Measures or an
unacceptable number of instances of the same Priority 3 Performance Measure
OR
-
any
single instance of non-compliance with a Priority 3 Performance Measure
identified in a previous performance review and not rectified within the
response time.
Satisfactory
-
full
compliance
OR
-
non-compliance
with an acceptable number of Priority 3 Performance Measures.
The person performing the inspection or review
in accordance with Clause G2.3 is to form their own interpretation of what is
'unacceptable' in terms of the number of instances of non-compliance. This
interpretation should take into account:
-
The
extent and severity of the non-compliances
-
the
number of non-compliances combined across all Priority levels e.g. if
non-compliance are recorded at both Priority 2 and 3 levels, unacceptable' may
be deemed to be a lower value than had only Priority 3 non-compliances been
recorded.
-
the
consequences of the reviewer's or inspector's interpretation and the relativity
of these in terms of what was actually recorded during the review or
inspection.
Disagreement as to what is unacceptable shall
be resolved in accordance with Clause 4.15.
The results of all inspections or reviews
performed in accordance with Clause G2.3 throughout the term of the Contract
are to be included in assessing the required response, summarised as follows
(i.e. any Marginal and Unsatisfactory results are cumulative throughout the
term of the Contract):
Results of Inspections
(Clauses G2.3.1,
G2.3.2 and G2.3.3)
|
Results of Reviews (Clause G2.3.4) |
Satisfactory |
One Marginal |
Two or More Marginal |
One or More Unsatisfactory |
|
Satisfactory |
N |
C |
M |
M |
|
One Marginal |
C |
M |
T |
M |
|
Two Marginal |
M |
T |
|
T |
|
Three Marginal |
T |
|
|
|
|
One Unsatisfactory |
M |
M |
T |
T |
|
Two Unsatisfactory |
T |
|
|
|
Table Key:
N= No action required
C= The Contractor is required
to perform corrective action. A subsequent inspection or review will be
performed six months after the inspection or review resulting in a less than
Satisfactory grade.
M= The Contractor is required
to perform corrective action accepted by the Management Board. A subsequent
inspection or review will be performed three month after the inspection or
review resulting in a less than Satisfactory grade.
T= The Principal may
terminate the Contract.
Prior to the first inspection o review being
performed in accordance with Clause G2.3 the Contractor's performance shall be
assumed to be Satisfactory.
Inspections or reviews performed subsequent to
the inspection or review resulting in a less than Satisfactory grade, will not
necessarily be limited to the non-compliances identified in the inspection or
review resulting in a less than Satisfactory grade.
Nothing in this clause shall effect the right
of the Principal to terminate the Contract under Clause 4.14 nor shall this
clause be considered to limit in any way the Contractor's responsibility to
comply fully with the requirement of the Contract, nor shall it imply any
constraints on the Superintendent to require a more timely remedy on any
particular non compliance.
G3.5 Contract Completion
The Contractor shall fulfil its obligations in
accordance with Clause 4.20.1.
The Independent Auditor will perform a review
in the final year in accordance with Clause G2.3.4.
The Superintendent will consider this review in
determining the Final Condition Standard and in the course of performing his
duties in accordance with Clause 4.20.2.
G4 PERFORMANCE MEASURES
PART 1: PHYSICAL WORKS
PERFORMANCE MEASURES
PART 1A: NETWORK
CONDITION MEASURES
PART 1B: ASSET
MAINTENANCE STANDARD
|
Feature |
Desire
Outcome |
Category |
Base Tender |
Response
time to correct deficiency |
Recommended
Boundary Criteria for Alternative
Offer |
||
|
Base
Condition Standard |
Handback
Compliance |
Compliance
During PSMC Period |
|||||
|
|
|||||||
|
Bleeding |
Binder no picked up on any time |
All Roads |
No free binder |
100% at base condition |
All bleeding surfaces treated |
2 hours |
No free binder which results in user complaints |
|
|
No surprise for drivers. Safe |
|
All required temporary warning signs erected
before grit spread |
100% at base condition |
All temporary warning signs required by the
Manual of Traffic Signs and Markings erected and maintained when grit spread |
At all times |
Base condition |
|
|
|
|
|
Grit and signs removed within 24 hour of
bleeding stopping |
100% at base condition |
Grit & temporary warning signs removed
when no bitumen bleeding |
At all times |
Base condition |
|
|
Snow |
No surprise for drivers. Safe |
All Roads |
Road closure signs erected if road
impassable. Emergency notification procedures and contingency plan enacted |
100% at base condition |
100% at base condition |
1 hour |
Base condition |
|
|
|
Roads passable |
North Network and all Urban |
Traffic lanes sufficiently free of snow to be
trafficable by light vehicles if safe and practical |
100% at base condition |
Continuous work to keep highway open and maintain
open as long as worker safety is not compromised |
2 hours |
Base condition |
|
|
|
|
South and East/West Networks |
Traffic lanes sufficiently free of snow to be
trafficable by light vehicles if safe and practical |
100% at base condition |
Continuous work in daylight hours to keep
highway open & maintain open as long as worker safety is not compromised |
2 hours |
Road passable single lane during daylight
hours only |
|
|
Ice |
No surprise for drivers. Safe |
All Roads |
All necessary permanent warning signs in
place during periods when ice may be present |
100% at base condition |
All permanent warning signs required by the
Manual of Traffic Signs and Markings erected at places where icing is frequently
a problem |
At all times in winter months |
Base condition |
|
|
|
|
|
All required temporary warning signs erected
before grit spread |
100% at base condition |
All temporary warning signs required by the
Manual of Traffic Signs and Markings erected and maintained when grit spread |
At all times |
Base condition |
|
|
|
|
|
Remove signs within 2 days of ice and grit
removal |
100% at base condition |
Grit & temporary warning signs removed
when no ice present |
At all times |
Base condition |
|
|
|
Adequate skid resistance |
North Network and associated urban |
Traffic lanes free of ice 6.00 am and 10,00
pm |
100% at base condition |
Traffic lanes free of ice |
2 hours |
Free of ice during normal working hours only |
|
|
|
|
South and East/West Networks and associated
urban |
Traffic lanes free of ice 90% of day light
hours each day |
100% at base condition |
Traffic lanes free of ice |
2 hours |
Free of ice during normal working hours only |
|
|
Road Closures for Emergency Events |
Motorist advised of road closure |
All Roads |
Appropriate temporary road closure signs
& barriers erected at the point of closure |
100% at base condition |
All closures sign posted correctly within
response times |
2 hours 6.00am to 6.00pm 4 hours 6.00pm to 6.00am |
Base condition |
|
|
|
|
|
Permanent road condition signs changed before
and after the closure |
100% at base condition |
All closures sign posted correctly within
response times |
30 minutes |
Base condition |
|
|
|
Service Agencies advised of road closure |
|
AA, local police and TNZ notified of closure
and regularly advised of developments |
100% at base condition |
All parties advised of closure and changes in
conditions within response time |
30 minutes for closure and reopening Status reports at least 4 hourly 6am to 8pm |
Base condition |
|
|
|
Closure
enforced |
North
Network |
Road closure barricades staffed at all times |
100%
at base condition |
Each closure manned at the barricades for at
least 95% of time |
1 hour |
Road closure barricades staffed only during
normal working hours |
|
|
|
|
South and East/West Networks and Urban |
Road closure barricades staffed in daylight
hours |
100% at base condition |
Each closure manned at the barricades for at
least 95% of time during daylight hour |
1 hour |
Road closure barricades not staffed |
|
|
Planned Road Closures for Maintenance and
Construction Works |
Minimal disruption to normal highway activity |
All Roads |
Formal approval obtained and motorist and
service agencies advised of closure |
100% at base condition |
100% compliance with State Highway Control
Manual requirements |
N/A |
Base condition |
|
|
|
Safety, smoothness, comfort |
|
No unsealed surfaces |
100% at base condition |
Not greater than 1000m of traffic lane at any
single project site unsealed for > 5 days without specific approval |
2 days |
Not greater than 1000m of traffic lane
unsealed for 5 days on North Network, 7 days for South Network, and 10 days
on East/West Network |
|
|
|
Safety and capacity |
|
No traffic delays |
100% at base condition |
3 minute maximum delay in urban areas, 5 minute maximum delay in rural areas Must have a contingency plan |
N/A |
Doubling of compliance delays at non-peak periods |
|
|
Detritus and Litter |
Safe, aesthetic functional, tidy and clean
appearance |
All Roads |
No detritus and litter visible on carriageway
and side slopes |
100% at base condition |
Not more than 10 items of litter in any one
kilometre visible on carriageway and side slopes |
1 month |
No dangerous and offensive detritus and
litter visible on carriageway and side slopes |
|
|
PART
1B (II) ASSET GROUP: SEALED CARRIAGEWAY (including sealed shoulders) |
|
|||||||
|
Skid Resistance |
Adequate Skid Resistance Safety |
All Roads, Site Cat.1 Intervention Level 0.45 SFC |
No Cat 1 sites with 100% SFC < 0.50 |
100% at base condition |
100% at base condition |
2 years |
Response time extended 1 month to 3 month 3 months to 6 months 1 year to 2 years 2 years to 3 years |
|
|
|
|
|
No Cat 1 sites with average SFC < 0.45 |
100% at base condition |
100% at base condition |
1 year |
|
|
|
|
|
|
No Cat 1 sites with average SFC < 0.40 |
100% at base condition |
100% at base condition |
3 months |
|
|
|
|
|
|
No 5 consecutive 10 metre sections within a
Cat 1 site with SFC < 0.45 |
100% at base condition |
100% at base condition |
1 year |
|
|
|
|
|
|
No 10 metre section within a Cat 1 site with SFC < 0.35 |
100% at base condition |
100% at base condition |
1 month |
|
|
|
|
|
All Roads, Site Cat.2 Intervention Level 0.40 SFC |
No Cat 2 sites with 100% SFC < 0.45 |
100% at base condition |
100% at base condition |
2 years |
Response times extended 1 month to 3 months, 3 months to 6 months, 1 year to 2 years, 2
year to 3 years |
|
|
Texture |
Adequate Texture and Safety |
All Asphaltic Paved Surfaces |
Mean MPD >70 mm* on all treatment lengths with asphaltic paved surfaces |
100% at base condition |
Not more than 2 asphaltic paved treatment
lengths not complying |
12 month |
Base condition |
|
|
|
|
|
Not more than 2m² in any location and not more than 1% of any treatment length area
with MPD >0.50mm* |
100% at base condition |
> 95% of any treatment length complying and not greater than 5m² with mean texture depth < 0.5mm in any single location |
2 months Sept-Apr 6 moths May-Aug |
Base condition |
|
|
|
|
All Chipseal Surfaces |
Mean MPD > 0.90mm* on all treatment lengths with chip sealed surfaces |
100% at base condition |
Not more than 5 chip sealed treatment lengths
not complying |
12 month |
Base condition |
|
|
|
|
|
Not more than 2m² in any
location and not more than 1% of any treatment length area with MPD >0.50mm* |
100% at base condition |
>95% of any treatment length complying and not greater than 5m² with mean
texture depth < 0.5mm in any single location |
2 months May-Aug 6 Months Sept-Apr |
Base condition |
|
|
Potholes |
Safety, Smoothness, Comfort |
North Network & associated urban |
No Potholes |
100% at base condition |
< 10 potholes with a diameter >100mm on any continues 5 km of lane length |
4 days |
Up to 40 potholes in any 5km of lane length
with no pothole >200mm diameter and/or response time up to 1 week |
|
|
|
|
South & East/West Networks &
associated urban |
No Potholes |
100% at base condition |
< 15 potholes with a diameter >100mm on any continuous 5km of lane length |
8 days |
Up to 60 potholes in any 5km of lane length
with no potholes >200mm diameter and/or response time up to 3 weeks |
|
|
Depressions |
Safety, Smoothness, Comfort |
North Network and associated urban |
No ponding of water >3mm above surfacing aggregate |
100% at base condition |
< 30m in any one km of wheel path with >3mm ponding |
6 months |
Base Condition |
|
|
|
|
South and East/West Networks and urban |
No ponding of water >3mm above surfacing aggregate |
100% at base condition |
Base condition 30m in any one km of wheel
path with >3mm ponding |
9 months |
Base condition |
|
|
Rutting |
Safety, Smoothness, Comfort |
All Roads |
No ruts greater than 30 mm deep which
concentrate runoff to a depth which induces aquaplaning or create safety
problems |
100% at base condition |
Not more than 5m in any 100m length of wheel
track in any lane with rutting exceeding 30mm depth |
12 months |
Base condition |
|
|
Shove/Heave |
Safety, Smoothness, Comfort |
All Roads where the shove/heave impacts on
safety |
No shove/heave which impacts on road user
safety |
100% at base condition |
No shove/heave which impacts on road user
safety. All shoves and heaves in or adjacent to wheel paths <20mm above adjoing carriageway surface |
2 weeks |
Base condition |
|
|
|
|
All Roads where the shove/heave impacts on
safety |
No shove/heave <50mm above adjoining nominal carriageway surface |
100% at base condition |
Less than 10m in any one km with shoves or
heave >50mm above adjoining nominal carriageway surface |
3 months |
Up to 100m in any km with shoves/heave exceeding
50mm provided (i) traffic lanes have no heave >20mm, (ii) no heave exceeds 100mm, and (iii) no heave impacts on
highway safety |
|
|
Edge
Break |
Safety Structural soundness, no surprises |
All Roads |
<2 metres of edge break per km of adjoining lane where width of seal
loss from nominal sealed shoulder edge exceeds 100 mm |
100% < base condition |
No greater than 5m of edge break per km of
adjoining lane where width of seal loss from nominal sealed shoulder edge
exceeds 100mm |
1 month where sealed shoulder is <0.5m wide 3 months where sealed shoulder is >0.5m wide |
Up to 50m of edge break per km of adjoining
lane where the seal loss exceeds 10mm provided the sealed shoulder width is >0.5m and the maximum seal loss is >300mm |
|
|
Service
Covers |
Waterproof, smooth riding |
All Roads |
Less than two on each network outside
tolerance of + 10mm in any direction from adjoining surface |
100% at base condition |
No greater than 2 service covers in 1km in
urban and nil in rural areas |
2 months |
Base condition |
|
|
Cracked
Surfaces |
Structurally sound pavement, waterproof |
All Roads |
<10m² of cracking evident in any km of road |
100% at base condition |
N/A |
N/A |
No cracking visible when inspected |
|
|
PART
1B (vi) ASSET GROUP: DRAINAGE |
||||||||
|
Culverts (<3-4 sqm waterway area) |
Functional |
All Roads |
All culverts > 90% functional |
100% at base condition |
All culverts with al least 80% waterway area
clear September to April inclusive |
2 months |
Each culvert > 80% functional at all times |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
All culverts at base condition May to August
inclusive |
1 month |
|
|
|
|
Structurally sound |
|
All culverts structurally sound |
100% at base condition |
All culverts monitored annually. All visual
signs of structural distress reported |
N/A |
Base condition |
|
|
Flumes |
Functional |
All Roads |
All flumes greater than 95% functional |
100% at base condition |
All flumes with at least 80% waterway area
clear September to April inclusive |
2 months |
Each flume > 80% functional at all times |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
All flumes at base condition May to August
inclusive |
1 month |
|
|
|
|
Structurally sound |
|
All flumes structurally sound |
100% at base condition |
All flumes monitored annually. All visual
signs of structural distress reported |
N/A |
Base condition |
|
|
Side
Drains and Surface Water Channel |
Functional |
All Roads |
All side drains and surface water channels
with >90% design waterway capacity available |
100% at base condition |
All side drains and surface water channels
with at least 80% waterway area clear Sep to April incl, |
2 months |
All side drains and surface water channels
with al least 80% of the waterway area clear at all times |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
All side drains and surface water channels
with at least 90% waterway area clear May to August incl, |
1 month |
|
|
|
Subsoil
Drains |
Functional |
All
Roads |
All subsoil drains functional |
100% at base condition |
All subsoil drains functional Sept to April
inclusive |
3
months |
Base
condition |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
All subsoil drains functional May to August inclusive |
1
month |
Base
condition |
|
|
Sumps, Manholes, Droppers, Catchpits |
Functional |
All
Roads |
All assets >75% functional |
100% at base condition |
All assets >75% functional Sep-Apr |
3
months |
Base
condition |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
All
assets >75% functional May-Aug |
1
month |
Base
condition |
|
|
Kerbs
& Channels |
Functional, not damaged to the extent that
the adjacent pavement is affected |
All
Roads |
100%
of K&C essential to the protection of the state highway asset functioning
satisfactory No
damaged/ broken/ missing
which has resulted in pavement deterioration |
100%
at base condition |
Deficiencies
in kerbs and channels which are resulting in deterioration of the adjacent
pavement are addressed within response times |
3
months |
Base
condition |
|
|
Other
Drainage Control Structures |
Functional |
All Roads |
All other drainage structures are functioning
satisfactory |
100% at base condition |
All drainage control and other structures
functional at all times |
2 months |
Base condition |
|
|
|
Structurally sound |
|
All other drainage structures are sound and
monitored annually |
100% at base condition |
All drainage control structures are monitored
annually and any identified structural deficiency reported |
N/A |
Base condition |
|
|
Preventive
maintenance |
Effects of erosion mitigated |
All Roads |
No identified potential erosion sites without
preventive treatment or in place |
100% at base condition |
All potential erosion and scour site
identified |
N/A |
Base condition |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Normal maintenance-type solutions which may
prevent or mitigate further erosion implemented |
Appropriate to
magnitude of problem and risk |
Base condition |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Major potential erosion problems reported |
1 week |
Base condition |
|
|
PART
2: SERVICES PERFORMANCE MEASURES |
||||||||
|
Reporting |
Work Category Report |
All Roads |
Breakdown of annual lump sum by the
applicable work categories |
100% compliance with base condition |
100% |
By 10 October each year |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Confirmation of report dated 10 October of
previous year |
100% compliance with base condition |
100% |
By 31 March each year |
|
|
|
|
Area Wide Treatment Achievement Report |
All Roads |
Achievement of output in kilometres |
100% compliance with base condition |
100% |
By 31 January, 31 March and 31 July each year |
|
|
|
|
Reseals Achievement Report |
All Roads |
Achievement of output in kilometres for
asphaltic concrete and friction course |
100% compliance with base condition |
100% |
By 31 January, 31 March and 31 July each year |
|
|
|
|
Drainage Improvements Achievement Report |
All Roads |
Achievement of output in kilometres of major
improvements |
100% compliance with base condition |
100% |
By 31 January, 31 March and 31 July each year |
|
|
|
|
Capital Works Report |
All Roads |
List of capital works project phases to be
put forward to Transfund in coming financial year |
100% compliance with base condition |
100% |
By 30 September each year |
|
|
|
|
RAMM Report |
All Roads |
Inventory and maintenance updates |
100% compliance with base condition |
100% |
By 21 July each year |
|
|
|
|
Accident Reports |
All Roads |
Detailing nature, location, extent, weather
conditions, condition of surfacing and traffic services and possible causes
together with suggested remedial works |
100% compliance with base condition |
100% |
Within 2 weeks of a fatal or serious accident |
|
|
|
|
Highway Information and Route Data Sheets |
All Roads |
Update compliance with base condition |
100% |
100% |
By 30 June each year |
|
|
|
|
Resource Consent Reports |
All
Roads |
Progress of applications |
100% compliance with base condition |
100% |
Within 2 weeks of request by Super-Intendant |
|
|
|
|
Local Authority Information Report |
|||||||